Education and Technology in the Elementary School
Department
of Curriculum and Teaching
Summer, 2005
E-mail:
jtoth@hunter.cuny.edu
|
COURSE
DESCRIPTION: Teacher
candidates will explore how electronic media can be meaningfully infused into
curriculum planning, presentation, structure, and materials. As a
culminating activity, teacher candidates will create interactive learning
activities that utilize numerous multimedia applications and tools.
They will also skillfully draw from research, information, and opportunities
on the Internet to enhance their professional environment. Syllabus
on the web: http://www.johntoth.net/Hunter/EDC714/EDC714.htm or http://toth.home.pipeline.com/Hunter/EDC714.htm |
||
|
HUNTER
COLLEGE
|
||
|
DATE |
DISCUSSION |
ASSIGNMENT |
|
June 1 |
Overview
of information processing theory as it relates to visual/verbal learning
styles.
Open discussion of the meaningful enrichment of curriculum materials to
accommodate the needs of various learning styles by infusing appropriate
technology. Technology: computers, TV, internet, programs,
Curriculum
Materials: data,
software, technology lesson
plans, technology standards
Learning Styles: multiple
intelligences, multidisciplinary practice,
Discussion
of communication and technology – how it relates to education. Overview
of media literacy, communication, multimedia, instructional design,
technology transfer, constructivism, cognition, learning, and structuring
learning events using the ----- http://www.denison.k12.ia.us/hs/Useful_Docs/Complete%20Integrated%20Thinkin.pdf Television and reading; deconstruction
and construction messages in all media; television and creativity. http://interact.uoregon.edu/MediaLit/mlr/readings/articles/degaetano/readingtv.html Connecting
in-school and out-of-school learning experiences; effect viewing
television habits and computer/video game interaction habits, have on a child’s
learning, perceptions, expectations, and social reality. Sites:
Media
Literacy Review http://interact.uoregon.edu/MediaLit/HomePage “Media literacy is
concerned with helping students develop an informal and critical
understanding of the nature of mass media…” Media Literacy
Clearinghouse.
http://medialit.med.sc.edu/medialiteracy.htm
Workshop: film
– “Teach the Children” |
Bitter
& Peirson Chpts. 1, 4, 5, 17, 18 U Tech Class Ch 7, p 136-148 Go to BB |
|
June 2 |
Overview
of the Critical Thinking Models that lay the foundation
for complex thinking processes: Content/Basic Thinking: Teacher directs instruction TO student.
Critical Thinking, Teacher collaborates
WITH student Starts with HOW thinking is to be assessed: Establishes levels of thinking expertise:
rubrics, standards Emphasizes explanation, demonstration,
application of knowledge. Demonstration of a unique situation: Demands a lived understanding of knowledge; read,
write, speak, listen. Creative Thinking. Student creates
independently with little intervention by the teacher. Imagination, synthesis, personal experience, self
created knowledge. Constructivism : http://www.emtech.net/links/construc.htm Question / Ponder: student centered, open
questions, reflective consideration Explore: heuristic approach, content driven, inquiry
based Discover: Explanation: Blooms
Taxonomy: Beyond Bloom: http://www.nexus.edu.au/teachstud/gat/whitton.htm Overview
of semantic networking and the software tools currently available to assist
the development and structure of meaningful learning events. Use
Inspiration to structure a meaningful learning event. Model
of the Integrated Thinking Model using INSPIRATION – reinforce the thought
processes involved in preparing meaningful learning events. Review
of graphics application packages: Using
graphic applications to enhance understanding of material. Sites:
Critical
Thinking
– Jonessen
discusses Integrated Thinking Model and learning WITH technology in general
-- http://www.chss.iup.edu/jrmcdono/ED455-methods/mindtools.htm Exploring
Learning in a Technology Rich Environment – very nice article -- http://ifets.ieee.org/periodical/vol_3_2001/daley.pdf
An
extensive index of free sites for teachers – give yourself time here -- http://www.sitesforteachers.com/index3.html Referred
to as the “best on the web” for teachers – I tend to agree – http://teachers.teach-nology.com/index4.html Very
interesting case studies of technology uses in K-2 education from Semantic
Network – http://www.johntoth.net/EDC714/SemanticNetwork/SemanticNetworkWeb.htm Workshop: IN
CLASS preparation of an INSPIRATION
semantic map
of a specific curriculum lesson or unit using the structure of the Integrated Thinking Model. Homework: Please deconstruct your
favorite TV program. Use the TVJournal
files below. Television Journal One http://www.johntoth.net/Hunter/EDC714/Activities/TV1/TelevisionJournalNumberOne.htm Television
Journal Two http://www.johntoth.net/Hunter/EDC714/Activities/TV2/TelevisionJournalNumberTwo.htm |
Bitter &
Peirson Chpts. 6, 10 |
|
June 6 |
TELEVISION
JOURNAL ONE & TWO DUE
Model and
review of the technology tools typically used to create meaningful learning
events and materials.
Open discussion of format, structure, and presentation of curriculum materials.
Overview of traditional and non-traditional media and technology:
the range of multimedia from less technical to more technical.
Assessing the learning styles of students including student
readiness, student application of formal reasoning schemas, and student
differences in information reception and retention.
Discussion and review of technology tools often used to enhance
learning in the classroom.
Review of word processing application tools (specifically WORD) and
spreadsheet application tools (specifically EXCEL)..
Sites:
Learning
styles from ProTeacher – make sure you look on
the side to see various articles of interest: http://www.proteacher.com/040009.shtml Education
Site Links
– nicely
organized -- http://home.computer.net/~dibianco/educatio.html Search terms: “lesson plans”
AND “using spreadsheets” on Yahoo returned 358 sites…just browsing through
some of these I found some wonderful lessons and ideas you may find
helpful. Enjoy! http://eduweb.brandonu.ca/~edtech/class/spread/s-index.htm Graphing
Rainbows by Harry Tschoerner, Grade
4-6: Mathematics http://www.tamu-commerce.edu/coe/shed/espinoza/s/tschoerner-h-lp2.html
Spreading
Christmas Cheer Using Spreadsheets by Harry Tschoerner, http://www.tamu-commerce.edu/coe/shed/espinoza/s/tschoerner-h-lp1.html
Weather
Statistics Activity by Sofia Stutts
Grade 7/8: Math/Science http://www.tamu-commerce.edu/coe/shed/espinoza/s/stutts-s-lp1.html
Climate
Change Over 50 Years- Local Community by Gibson Associates Grade 5-9:
Science/Social Studies http://www.netcore.ca/~gibsonjs/g200-3t.htm Word Processing in the Classroom http://members.tripod.com/cynthiasparks/wdprochandouts.htm Assistive Technology – a broad overview of resources
and information -- http://www.ataccess.org/resources/atk12/introduction.html Interesting
article on how assistive
technology
helps
children – means to acquire this technology -- http://www.education-world.com/a_tech/tech086.shtml Workshop: The
session will be devoted to hands-on educational applications of WORD
and EXCEL for the classroom. Word:
http://www.johntoth.net/Hunter/EDC714/Activities\Word\WordWorksheet.htm Excel:
http://www.johntoth.net/Hunter/EDC714/Activities/Excel/ExcelWorkshop.htm Excel:
http://www.johntoth.net/Hunter/Activities/Excel/ExcelSpreadSheet.htm |
Bitter &
Peirson Chpts. 2, 12, 13, 15, 16 Learning Space Digital Logic |
|
June 7 |
Overview of Visual
Presentation Software: Model
the process of clearly presenting a learning activity that was structured
using Inspiration and created using PowerPoint. Open discussion of Paint
programs and the visual interpretation of a verbal message. Workshop: Activities in this session will be
two-fold: first, students will create a POWERPOINT presentation
to meaningfully present a curriculum concept; and second, students
will participate in an activity to visually communicate a verbal message
using PAINT. |
Bitter &
Peirson Chpt. 14 Producing and
Presenting |
|
June 8 |
Audio and Video Applications.
Overview of multimedia educational
materials, visual and verbal learning styles, effective integration of
technology into curriculum. Building a lesson using technology (audio,
video, computer multimedia). Elements of a good lesson and assessment
techniques. Workshop: Presentation
and modeling Audio / visual Reinforcement to enhance lessons. Voice
Wave File – http://www.johntoth.net/Hunter/EDC714/Images/TothWaveFile2SLOW.jpg |
|
|
June 9 |
TAKE HOME MIDTERM EXAMINATION due
on June 14 Overview
of Evaluation and Assessment of Internet websites. Overview
of educational software in general What it does and does NOT do How it must be structured
for learning to be meaningful. Discussion
of the messages being sent through educational games as well as games that
are not categorized as being educational, but are quite popular with
children. Sites:
Software
Evaluation
– overview
article -http://www.childrenssoftware.com/evaluation.html Software
Evaluation forms:
http://facweb.stvincent.edu/academics/Education/L2L/Eval/page5.html Workshop: Formal Evaluation
of a
website
that has been selected to appropriately enhance, reinforce, or model a
specific content area for a specific grade level. Selected Research Evaluation Criteria
Groups will be created for group project. |
Bitter &
Peirson Chpts. 3, 7, 8, 9,11 Internet Educational
Software Web Search Lesson Plan Data Analysis |
|
June 13 |
FORMAL EVALUATION DUE Structuring
Queries
for optimal
information retrieval on the Internet. Model
and review of Internet searching strategies. Open
discussion of linking a child’s environment to curriculum areas to make it
more meaningful. Sites:
Several
sites here about searching the internet – also includes numerous resources --
http://www.wtps.org/links/teacher.html Education
Site Links
- nicely
organized - http://home.computer.net/~dibianco/educatio.html Kathy Schrock’s Guide for
Educators:
http://school.discovery.com/schrockguide/
Workshop: Surfing
the Internet to locate and access meaningful information, as well as lesson
plans on the Internet that could model, enhance, or reinforce a specific
curriculum concept that you believe could help YOU present this concept and
motivate children at the same time (including those linked to children’s
television). |
|
|
June 14 |
MIDTERM EXAMINATION DU E Students
will work in groups to create the Selected Research Response Project http://www.johntoth.net/Hunter/EDC714/Activities/EDC714SU05midterm.htm |
|
|
June 15 |
SELECTED RESEARCH PROJECTS DUE Designing
Webquests
–
Open discussion about the design and implementation of interactive learning
activities, such as Webquests. Sites: Webquests
for Learning -- http://www.ozline.com/learning/index.htm Filamentality
– Step by step guide -- http://www.kn.pacbell.com/wired/fil/ Searching
for Culture
Quests -- http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Oracle/6676/quests.html School
Violence -- http://www.biopoint.com/WebQuests/BA1/Welcome.html Ecosystems
and Commerce -- http://www.biopoint.com/WebQuests/Ben/Welcome.html Classifying
the Planets -- http://www.macomb.k12.mi.us/wq/pbs2ucs.htm Create
a Habitat -- http://www.biopoint.com/WebQuests/dist204/Welcome.html Space
Station -- http://www.biopoint.com/WebQuests/AMS/Welcome.html Water:
Each Drop Counts -- http://newton.kamsc.k12.mi.us/quest/water/Water.htm Clouds
-- http://www.macomb.k12.mi.us/wq/WebQ97/clouds.htm Investigating
Your Heritage -- http://www.macomb.k12.mi.us/wq/WebQ97/Roots.htm Colonial
Revolutionary
War -- http://www.macomb.k12.mi.us/wq/WebQ97/REVOLUT.HTM Letter
Writing -- http://www.macomb.k12.mi.us/wq/WebQ97/FANLET.HTM Travel
-- http://www.macomb.k12.mi.us/wq/WebQ97/airfare.htm Bluebird
Quest -- http://www2.lhric.org/kat/BLUE.HTM Clouds
-- http://www2.lhric.org/kat/wq3rd.htm Owl
Quest -- http://www.qesn.meq.gouv.qc.ca/schools/pcartier/owlquest.htm Pumpkin
Quest -- http://www2.lhric.org/kat/PMPKS.HTM Space
Colony Quest -- http://www.coollessons.org/spacecolony.htm Multimedia
in the Classroom -- http://fcit.usf.edu/multimedia/index.html |
|
|
June 16 |
In-class
work on YOUR Webquest. (including
the associated INSPIRATION model to insure curriculum infusion) |
|
|
June 20 |
In-class work on your Webquest
|
|
|
June 21 |
Presentation of WEBQUESTS |
|
|
June 22 |
Writing a Grant
Proposal
Overview
of the basic elements of a grant proposal. Sites:
School Grants Technology
Links: -- http://www.schoolgrants.org/Links/technology.htm Educational
Technology Standards – From NCATE -- http://www.ecsu.ctstateu.edu/depts/edu/bibliographies/edtechstandards.html Grants
With No Deadlines (http://www.palmbeach.k12.fl.us/ORD/grant-opportunities/Grants_No_deadlines.htm
) links you to several companies and corporations that offer incentives to
educators. School Grants (http://www.schoolgrants.org/) is
described as the “One Stop shopping for K-12 Education”. It is a
wonderful resource to help you find a grant you can think about acquiring. The Washington Post
(http://washpost.com/community/education/gea.shtml)
offers information on several grants. You will see variations on this
site that are quite unique. The Grants and
Education Center (http://www.martindalecenter.com/RefGrants.html)
offers information on many, many funding resources. I especially like
the way the outline the Foundation resources. Technology and Learning (http://www.techlearning.com/grants.html
) offers a site that allows you to search a database of grants and
contests. I haven’t actually searched the database, but on quick glance
I think the concept is interesting. You may secondarily find contests
you may want some of your students to enter…always a good motivator. The Art and Architecture Library (http://aal.ucsd.edu/grants.html )
is another database of grants – though some of these are related to a
specific content area, overall it is a very interesting site. This
News Digest (http://www.sabine.k12.la.us/vrschool/grants.htm
) funding resource lists several resources – some of these are duplicates,
but some are not. It is worth a look. Workshop:
Surfing
an assortment of grant funding sites…this will be finalized close to this
session. |
|
|
June 23 |
In-class
work on grant proposal |
|
|
June 27 |
GRANT
PROPOSALS DUE
– each group will present an overview of their grant proposal to the
class.
|
|
Required
Secondary
Text (Highly Recommended): Steven C. Mills and M.D. Roblyer (2003), Technology
Tools for Teachers,
Conferences: Though my scheduled
office hours this semester are Mon-Thurs,
|
Course
Evaluation: Evaluation will be
based on the following: |
|
|
Midterm written examination: |
20% |
Television Journals
2)
|
10%
|
|
Website evaluation : |
05% |
|
Selected Research Response |
20% |
|
WebQuest |
20% |
|
Final grant proposal |
20% |
|
Attendance and participation: |
05% |
Your “midterm” grade will
be reduced by 10% for each day past the due date.
Your “television journal”
grade will be reduced by 10% for each day past the due date.
Your “website evaluation”
grade will be reduced by 10% for each day past the due date.
Your “selected research
responsel” grade will be reduced by 10% for each day past the due date.
Your “webquest” grade will
be determined by what you hand-in, rather than your presentation.
Your “final grant
presentation” will be a group grade.
Your “attendance” grade
will be reduced by 10% for each absence over the one un-excused absence
allowed.
Please
note:
Plagiarism:
As per the statement in the graduate catalog (p. 49): “Any deliberate
borrowing of the ideas, terms, statements, or knowledge of others without clear
and specific acknowledgement of the source is intellectual theft and is called
plagiarism. In this course, all work must be your own creation.
Plagiarized work will NOT be accepted as fulfilling any requirement.
Hunter has an agreement with Turnitin.Com that I will use if I suspect
plagiarized material. I also have other means to determine inappropriate
use of copyrighted materials.
Access
and Accommodations for Students with Disabilities: We recommend that all
HC students with disabilities explore the support services and register with
the Office for Access and Accommodations. HC students with disabilities
are protected by the Americans with Disabilities Ace (ADA), which requires that
they be provided equal access to education and reasonable accommodations.
In compliance with ADA and with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, Hunter
is committed to ensuring this educational access and accommodations. For
information and assistance, contact the Office for Access and Accommodations in
Room 1124 or call (212)772-4857 or (212)650-3230.
Jonassen,
David H. (2000). Computers as Mindtools for Schools: Engaging Critical Thiking
(Second Edition) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merril.
Provenzo,
Eugene F. (1999). The Internet and the World Wide Web for Preservice
Teachers,
Baggett,
Patricia (1979). “Structurally equivalent stories in movie and text and
the effect of the medium on recall”. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal
Behavior, 18, 333-356.
Considine,
David M. and Gail E. Haley, (1992). Visual messages: Integrating
imagery into instruction. Teacher Idea Press: Englewood, Colorado.
Dorr,
Aimee, (1986). TV and children: A special medium for a special
audience. London: Sage.
Duffy,
Thomas M. and Johassen, David H. “CONSTRUCTIVISM: New implications
for instructional technology?” Educational Technology, May, 1991, 7-12.
Healy,
Jane M. (1990). Endangered minds: Why children don’t think
and what we can do about it. New York: Touchstone Books.
Nickerson,
R.S. & Zodhiates, P.P. (1988). Technology in Education:
Looking toward 2020. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Perkins,
D.N. (1991). “Technology meets CONSTRUCTIVISM: Do they make a
marriage?” Educational Technology, May, 1991, 18-23.
Papert,
S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful
ideas. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
Black,
J., Swan, K., & Schwartz, D. (1988). Developing thinking skills with
computers. Teachers College Record, 89(3(, 384-407.
Booth,
P. (1989). An introduction to human-computer interaction.
London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bybee,
R.W. and Sund, R.B. (1982). Piaget for educators. Columbus,
OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Co.
Bullough,
R.V. and Beatty, L.F. (1991). Classroom applications of microcomputers.
New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Davy, J. (1984). Mindstorms in the
lamplight. Teachers College Record, 85, 549-558.
Geisert,
P.G. and Futrell, M.K. (1990). Teachers, computers, and
curriculum: Microcomputers in the classroom. Boston:
Allyn and Bacon.
Krendl,
K.A. and Lieberman, D.A. (1988). Computers and learning: A review
of the recent literature. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4,
367-389.
Langhorne,
M.J. et.al. (1989). Teaching with computers: A new menu for the
90’s. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx
Press.
Robyler,
M.D., Castine, W.H. and King, F.J. (1988). Assessing the impact of
computer-based instruction. Computers in the Schools, 5,
1-149.
Scheingold, K., Martin, L. and
Simmons,
W. (1987). Beyond basic skills: Literacy and technology for
minority schools. In R.D. Pea and K. Scheingold (Eds.) Mirrors of
Minds (pp. 86-100). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Company.
Swan,
K. (1991). Programming objects to think with: Logo and the teaching
and learning of problem solving. Journal of Educational Computing
Research, 7(1), 89-112.
J. Douglas Kneale, Deconstruction, http://www.press.jhu.edu/books/hopkins_guide_to_literary_theory/deconstruction.html
Topics Index Cross-references for this Guide
entry:
écriture,
allegory,
anthropology,
aporia,
close
reading, deconstruction,
feminism,
grammatology,
intentionality,
intertextuality,
logocentrism,
logos,
Marxism,
metonymy,
phallocentrism,
repression,
structural
linguistics, transcendental,
trope,